Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

Author's logo


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:08 PM

I want to give a small mark to the scripts i adapted to nativeEX or which are written nateiveEX-ready.
To do so, i have to export the 'authors logo', change it and encode again.

Is there a way to export?

BTW: The DAU logo mentioned here looks like a joke. But I think we should think about a second mark 'Easy to use'. As long as a script has no (serious) complains it is allowed to carry this logo. What do you think about that?
Such a procedure maybe causes the .script developers (me included) to be proud about the logo and therefore try really to make it DAU ready.

Peter

#2 Nuno Brito

Nuno Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10545 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:17 PM

Sounds a good innitiative.. :P

After 053 is ready will add this export option as a button on the description tab! :P


To manually edit the logo image, place the folder entry inside the attachements folder like this:

Using OffByOne script as an example..

[EncodedFolders]OffByOne
AuthorEncoded


[EncodedFile-AuthorEncoded-ob1_logo4.gif]
lines=0
0=...........................................................

[AuthorEncoded]
ob1_logo4.gif=742bytes,990bytes
Logo=ob1_logo4.gif


:P

#3 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:28 PM

Sounds a good innitiative.. :P

After 053 is ready will add this export option as a button on the description tab! :P


To manually edit the logo image, place the folder entry inside the attachements folder like this:

Using OffByOne script as an example..



:P


Thanks. :P
Extracting gives a error message about 'Index out of bounds', but it extracts!
(Extracting 'to script directory' does not work. But I can extract 'the complete folder' into a dir of my choice)

Peter

#4 Nuno Brito

Nuno Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10545 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 07 January 2007 - 05:30 PM

Thanks. :P
Extracting gives a error message about 'Index out of bounds', but it extracts!
(Extracting 'to script directory' does not work. But I can extract 'the complete folder' into a dir of my choice)

Peter


likely a bug - haven't modified that code section on very long time.. :P

#5 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 06:11 PM

But I think we should think about a second mark 'Easy to use'. As long as a script has no (serious) complains it is allowed to carry this logo. What do you think about that?
Such a procedure maybe causes the .script developers (me included) to be proud about the logo and therefore try really to make it DAU ready.

Peter


The much better solution is to use 4S Logo instead of 'Easy to use'!

#6 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 07 January 2007 - 06:40 PM

The much better solution is to use 4S Logo instead of 'Easy to use'!

I think it has been a joke by you, but I see it seriously: Why not?

Herewith let's start the discussion about your suggestion. :P
But first: Please post the logo (.jpg or .gif or .png) :P
(Perhaps suggestions by the forum?)

Peter

#7 smiley

smiley

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 905 posts
  •  
    Greece

Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:19 PM

I think it has been a joke by you, but I see it seriously: Why not?

Herewith let's start the discussion about your suggestion. :P
But first: Please post the logo (.jpg or .gif or .png) :P
(Perhaps suggestions by the forum?)

Peter


.gif or png is better because they can be transparent .

I suggest to make it clearer. I think this would be even better than the 4s or DAU :

1.gif 2.gif 3.gif

John

#8 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 09:34 PM

A check? :P
What kind of check?

#9 smiley

smiley

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 905 posts
  •  
    Greece

Posted 07 January 2007 - 09:44 PM

I mean what the image shows

#10 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 07 January 2007 - 10:16 PM

I think it has been a joke by you, but I see it seriously: Why not?

Herewith let's start the discussion about your suggestion. :P
But first: Please post the logo (.jpg or .gif or .png) :P
(Perhaps suggestions by the forum?)

Peter


It is my avatar:

4S.jpg

Avatar.jpg

It is very effective and symbolic (stylized letters are four “S” in Cyrillic),
with meaning: Simple, Small, Stable and Superior.

#11 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 08 January 2007 - 12:34 AM

It is my avatar:

4S.jpg

Avatar.jpg

It is very effective and symbolic (stylized letters are four “S” in Cyrillic),
with meaning: Simple, Small, Stable and Superior.

No, we can't just use a check-mark. When there is no price money associated with this, the logo and the title have to be at least impressive! :P

Have you really thought the idea trough, about using the 4S logo? Cause if we do choose it, you can't use it anymore.

#12 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 08 January 2007 - 11:06 AM

Have you really thought the idea trough, about using the 4S logo?
Cause if we do choose it, you can't use it anymore.


I don't knom why, but I don't mind it!

#13 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 08 January 2007 - 01:08 PM

I don't knom why...

Because if you would, your software would get automaticly the 4S logo and that would be unfair! :P




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users