Jump to content











Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

[tool] reg2WBS


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
324 replies to this topic

#301 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1729 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 27 May 2011 - 11:47 AM

What is download link? Link in first post gives 4.0.3 version.

#302 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 27 May 2011 - 12:04 PM

What is download link? Link in first post gives 4.0.3 version.

Sorry. Old link to nativeex.boot-land.net which is no longer accessible for me to update.

I corrected the link to point to my server.

Peter

#303 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 27 May 2011 - 01:56 PM

New version Reg2WBS 4.2.1 online.
Lines starting with a semicolon are skipped.

Usually \\ are replaced by \
For WinBuilder script syntax that is ok.

Maybe there is a special buggy condition. I need a *.reg where the replacement goes wrong.

Peter

Here was the very rare condition that a value name was a path:

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\Folders]
"R:\\Program Files\\"=""
"R:\\Program Files\\OO Software\\"=""


Version 4.2.2 is online which fixes that.

Peter

#304 Filip Hasa

Filip Hasa

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 408 posts

Posted 27 May 2011 - 02:09 PM

Amazing. Works like charm.

Thank you

RegShot use ";" comments as well.

#305 Filip Hasa

Filip Hasa

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 408 posts

Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:43 AM

Hi Peter,

am I right I thought that this reg shoud be skiped:

reg_add,0x1,%reg%\Classes\CLSID\{C1051DD2-472F-4B24-B47A-06769096CE34}\Shell
reg_add,0x1,%reg%\Classes\CLSID\{C1051DD2-472F-4B24-B47A-06769096CE34}\Shell\Open,,"Open"

Thank you

#306 Filip Hasa

Filip Hasa

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 408 posts

Posted 01 June 2011 - 06:50 AM

Hi Peter again,

can you insert some exclusion filed(s) which registry we don't want proceed?!

Thank you

#307 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 01 June 2011 - 08:46 AM

am I right I thought that this reg shoud be skiped:

reg_add,0x1,%reg%\Classes\CLSID\{C1051DD2-472F-4B24-B47A-06769096CE34}\Shell
reg_add,0x1,%reg%\Classes\CLSID\{C1051DD2-472F-4B24-B47A-06769096CE34}\Shell\Open,,"Open"

Logically the line is not necessary.

Currently I just read input line by line, and write the corresponding output line.

Your suggestion would require to buffer the output and when processing next line it is decided whether to write the previous line.

There are for me too many possibillities that something goes wrong.

can you insert some exclusion filed(s) which registry we don't want proceed?!

I put it onto the ToDo list.
Curently I do not have the time to do.

Peter

#308 sbaeder

sbaeder

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:usa - massachusettes
  •  
    United States

Posted 01 June 2011 - 05:48 PM

can you insert some exclusion filed(s) which registry we don't want proceed?!

As workaround, you would just have to process the one(s) you DID want, which might require multiple executions of the tool - right???

Scott

#309 Filip Hasa

Filip Hasa

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 408 posts

Posted 02 June 2011 - 05:00 AM

Logically the line is not necessary.

Currently I just read input line by line, and write the corresponding output line.

Your suggestion would require to buffer the output and when processing next line it is decided whether to write the previous line.

There are for me too many possibillities that something goes wrong.


I put it onto the ToDo list.
Curently I do not have the time to do.

Peter


Hi Peter,

i found rule: regexp:

^[^,]+,[^,]+,[^,]+$

this line will be exclude it.

Thanks

#310 u2o

u2o

    Frequent Member

  • .script developer
  • 257 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  •  
    Argentina

Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:32 PM

Peter: Wow, this app is wonderfully amazing! :cheers:

I'm sure it took you much much time to perfect the code. :cheers: :rofl: :worship:

Thanks for share!!!!

Edited by u2o, 18 June 2011 - 10:32 PM.


#311 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 25 June 2011 - 04:56 PM

Stopped support on 2011-JUN-25.
GENA claims to have the much better solution.
Files removed from the server.

Peter

#312 pecd.net

pecd.net

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 947 posts
  •  
    Germany

Posted 25 June 2011 - 05:09 PM

:unsure:

#313 homes32

homes32

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:Minnesota
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 June 2011 - 05:38 PM

here we go again.... :unsure:

#314 u2o

u2o

    Frequent Member

  • .script developer
  • 257 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  •  
    Argentina

Posted 25 June 2011 - 05:57 PM

Then, What is the "supposed" right tool? :cheers: :unsure:

No matter if something is wrong, I'll continue using it because the formatting of the value of registry (for me) is right. If something is bad, I will verify, when I implement the code to the script.

Edited by u2o, 25 June 2011 - 06:00 PM.


#315 homes32

homes32

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:Minnesota
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 June 2011 - 06:04 PM

there is no right or wrong tool. its all in what you personally want to use. being able to choose between several nice tools is a GOOD THING!

#316 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 25 June 2011 - 06:05 PM

Then, What is the "supposed" right tool? :cheers: :unsure:

No matter if something is wrong, I'll continue using it because the formatting of the value of registry (for me) is right. If something is bad, I will verify, when I implement the code to the script.

As long, as seriously advertised GENA alternative suggestions appear here in a non-GENA forum, I react with hiding my tools.
If somebody needs my tools, he / she should explain it clearly here.
Peter

#317 u2o

u2o

    Frequent Member

  • .script developer
  • 257 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  •  
    Argentina

Posted 25 June 2011 - 06:17 PM

there is no right or wrong tool. its all in what you personally want to use. being able to choose between several nice tools is a GOOD THING!

But in the absence, I believe that the existence of one is better than nothing. New users will haven't this tool available to ease the transformation of registry strings, which frankly is appalling manually and is very easy to make mistakes.

Edited by u2o, 25 June 2011 - 06:19 PM.


#318 homes32

homes32

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:Minnesota
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 June 2011 - 06:18 PM

As long, as serious GENA alternative suggestions appear here in a non-GEMA forum, for me they are the only "supposed" (NOT BY ME) tool, and to make this visible to the forum, I react with hiding my tools.
If somebody needs my tools, he / she should explain it clearly here.
Peter

that's ridiculous. should you also start hiding your tools if someone form 911cd or another PE site mentions a tool that does something one of your tools does????

I mentioned RegCPE because pecd.net asked to tool suggestions. not because I have anything against reg2WBS. you will notice that the suggestion even occurred in a seperate thread and not in this (your programs) thread. I would have also mentioned reg2WBS if you had not already done so in the reply before me.

options are a good thing to have and nobody is forcing anyone to use a particular tool, nor are they putting down other people's tools.

I happen to think RegCPE and your reg2WBS are both good tools and I am happy to have the choice of using one or the other or both as I see fit.

#319 u2o

u2o

    Frequent Member

  • .script developer
  • 257 posts
  • Location:Argentina
  •  
    Argentina

Posted 25 June 2011 - 06:31 PM

that's ridiculous. should you also start hiding your tools if someone form 911cd or another PE site mentions a tool that does something one of your tools does????


Is that true? :unsure: :cheers: :(

#320 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 25 June 2011 - 08:07 PM

that's ridiculous. should you also start hiding your tools if someone form 911cd or another PE site mentions a tool that does something one of your tools does????

I wouldn't.
But I do so, when people create a WB based project where "everything is better" including WB tools I created.
Look e.g. into Win7PE_PE for the occurences of "exbuilder" comments.
Team work ???

My tools are my tools. And I can offer them public or use private (or additionally for friends' use) as I want.

Peter

#321 homes32

homes32

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:Minnesota
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 June 2011 - 08:19 PM

please point out where it says regCPE is better than reg2WBS

also the software is made by BlueLife, not the Gena project. posts are only made by lancelot because BlueLife speaks poor English...

#322 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 25 June 2011 - 08:34 PM

please point out where it says regCPE is better than reg2WBS

also the software is made by BlueLife, not the Gena project. posts are only made by lancelot because BlueLife speaks poor English...

Your link leads directly into the Gena URL.
Look to the complete list of your friends and to their posts / scripts using phrases like "exbuilder", "stupid WB development" and some other friendly comments.
Maybe you also remember some bannings to some of your friends by Nuno, caused by their behaviour in the forum.
homes32.gif

Still valid:

My tools are my tools. And I can offer them public or use private (or additionally for friends' use) as I want.

Here I decided to use reg2WBS only private or for friends.

Peter

#323 homes32

homes32

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1030 posts
  • Location:Minnesota
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 June 2011 - 10:09 PM

Your link leads directly into the Gena URL.
Look to the complete list of your friends and to their posts / scripts using phrases like "exbuilder", "stupid WB development" and some other friendly comments.
Maybe you also remember some bannings to some of your friends by Nuno, caused by their behaviour in the forum.
homes32.gif

Still valid:

Here I decided to use reg2WBS only private or for friends.

Peter


your argument is off base. the topic that RegCPE is in contains no negative references, regardless of what may be posted in the rest of the forum.
It is no secret that I dislike excessive public complaining/bashing, nor do I think its appropriate in app scripts. A person does not have to agree with everything one's friends do in order to be friends. Nor are you an innocent victim of their wrath, as we both know. Your disagreements with galapo, lancelot, and whoever else have no base with me or with the people who would like to use your program.

As you stated, they are your tools, do with them as you will, but I ask you to reconsider your overreaction and post them publicly again so that all may enjoy them. Thank you.

- Regards,
Homes32

#324 sbaeder

sbaeder

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:usa - massachusettes
  •  
    United States

Posted 26 June 2011 - 12:47 AM

I ask you to reconsider your overreaction and post them publicly again so that all may enjoy them. Thank you.

I too also ask you to reconsider this...This is the sort of thing that makes me sad... :unsure: When things go missing and "offline" :cheers: it is just bad for all of us.

Take the HIGH ROAD. Don't give into the name calling and poking back and forth. I agree 100% with Homes32...Choice is GOOD...What works for one may not work for another.

So, PLEASE reconsider your position...

Thanks in advance!
Scott

#325 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 31 August 2011 - 03:09 PM

By uploading the latest version to the new WinBuilder Download Portal, a new topic http://reboot.pro/15...post__p__136621 has been generated.

Let's close this topic and continue there.

Peter




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users