Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

MojoPac (free)


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Brito

Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10616 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 04 August 2009 - 01:21 PM

MojoPac is a sort of emulator software that runs on top of windows to allow executing programs from removable media without requiring to install them on the desktop machine.

They showcase how well this works for games, Office and such.

It seems that the company was recently acquired and the new owners decided to release it for free.

Any volunteer to check out if this works from a PE environment?

More details:
http://www.mojopac.rsvp1.com/

:idea:

#2 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 04 August 2009 - 01:26 PM

I don't quite get your drift.
Mojopack runs straight form a CD without the need for a PE.

But good news to hear that it's now free.

:idea:

#3 was_jaclaz

was_jaclaz

    Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 7101 posts
  • Location:Gone in the mist
  •  
    Italy

Posted 04 August 2009 - 01:43 PM

For the record, it has been free for personal use since a long time:
http://www.boot-land...?showtopic=5495
https://www.mojopac....nouncements.jsp

MojoPac Freedom is *free* for non-commercial personal use.


On the download page:
http://www.mojopac.com/download.html
there is still a link to the "old" Mojopac 1.8 Freedom:
http://www.mojopac.c...tml?packageId=9
and to the "new" 2.0 Free:
http://www.mojopac.c...veDownload.html

Original thread:
http://www.boot-land...?showtopic=1817

:idea:

jaclaz

#4 ktp

ktp

    Silver Member

  • Advanced user
  • 773 posts

Posted 04 August 2009 - 03:55 PM

I tested it few weeks ago. It has to be compared with VMware's ThinApp (aka Thinstall) or portable applications.

After installation, on your USB key/HDD you will have the 3 small directories: Documents and Settings, Program Files and Windows. It is a kind of switch user under XP.

- The initialization time is rather long, 3-4 minutes (in comparison to launch ThinApp application) before getting the Mojopac desktop.
- It has problem if your system drive not being C: (as mine which is F:). Some system fonts are changed on the host (this is very bad).
- It has limited or no access to host resources.

After some experimentations, I prefer true portable applications (speed, no limited access...) than Mojopac.

#5 TheHive

TheHive

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 4199 posts

Posted 22 August 2009 - 04:51 PM

Thanks for the 2.0. I tested the older version. 2.0 was not freeware at the time.

#6 steelbone

steelbone

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 126 posts
  •  
    Austria

Posted 25 August 2009 - 06:48 PM

Hi there,

i saw a Beta for Vista.

https://system.netsu...i...a9&_xt=.bin

i didn't tested it.

Regards

Steel

#7 TheHive

TheHive

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 4199 posts

Posted 26 August 2009 - 09:50 PM

So they are still developing it? Nice!

#8 Rex2010

Rex2010

    Newbie

  • Members
  • 15 posts
  •  
    China

Posted 03 June 2010 - 03:00 AM

I tested it few weeks ago. It has to be compared with VMware's ThinApp (aka Thinstall) or portable applications.

After installation, on your USB key/HDD you will have the 3 small directories: Documents and Settings, Program Files and Windows. It is a kind of switch user under XP.

- The initialization time is rather long, 3-4 minutes (in comparison to launch ThinApp application) before getting the Mojopac desktop.
- It has problem if your system drive not being C: (as mine which is F:). Some system fonts are changed on the host (this is very bad).
- It has limited or no access to host resources.

After some experimentations, I prefer true portable applications (speed, no limited access...) than Mojopac.


well, i recently also tried Mojopac and another one(i will mention later).
first, the initilaization is really a problem. it takes up the whole screen and it lasts several minuites. all you can do is just waiting.

second, i encouter the same problem when i first install it on drive E(my host system dirve is C ). it refuses to work. just a blank screen. as for fonts, not yet meet with.

third, limited access. and plus, you have to gain administer rights to use on other computers. this is also not good.

however, in terms of "portable" and"independant system", i think it already has done better than ceedo, u3.

Yet, i also find another gem of such kind, maybe even better than Mojopac seemingly at least. it is much less noticed, which is named Prayaya V3.
first as for setup and login time, it is faster and more friendly. it doesnot cover up your whole screen and login generally finishes within 10 seconds.

second, i installed it on drive E and drive C and USB, it does not have any problem to run. and no other strange things happen.

third, this one called prayaya can be used on computer as an guest. no administer rights needed. this is really a plus.

However, this one claims to be compatible with all windows software and almost all can be installed directly. it is not that true. some professional designers will not do, like Coreldraw, Photoshop etc.

yet i think it is encouraging that we will have more choice and we have better expectations.

#9 Wonko the Sane

Wonko the Sane

    The Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 16066 posts
  • Location:The Outside of the Asylum (gate is closed)
  •  
    Italy

Posted 03 June 2010 - 08:49 AM

Yep :), but I can see EXACTLY 49 reasons that make a difference:
http://www.boot-land...?...c=5495&st=2
Mojopac=Free
Prayaya V3=US$49

:(
Wonko

#10 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 03 June 2010 - 01:23 PM

Yep :(, but I can see EXACTLY 49 reasons that make a difference:
Mojopac=Free
Prayaya V3=US$49

I rather pay for something that works good, instead of getting for free something that works bad. :(

:)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users