Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

Registry cleaning.


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 08:09 AM

@Peter.

As I have promised, attached is result of RegVac registry cleaning
of my usual nativeEx build, for your consideration.

Kind regards.

Attached File  Undo20080118.zip   10.21KB   416 downloads
Attached File  log.zip   129.6KB   282 downloads

#2 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 08:42 AM

@Peter.

As I have promised, attached is result of RegVac registry cleaning
of my usual nativeEx build, for your consideration.

Kind regards.

*attachment=4108:Undo20080118.zip*
*attachment=4109:log.zip*


I see a small issue:

A lot of them are denerated automatically when shell32.dll, brwoseui.dll etc. are registered.
In your case that is at boot time.

That means that they do not exist when the ISO is built, and therfore cannot removed ...

Peter

#3 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 02:48 PM

I see a small issue:

A lot of them are denerated automatically when shell32.dll, brwoseui.dll etc. are registered.
In your case that is at boot time.

That means that they do not exist when the ISO is built, and therfore cannot removed ...

Peter



Have you any idea why this is happening?

After RegVac removes all those entries,
nativeEx build continue working without any problems!

#4 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 03:32 PM

Have you any idea why this is happening?

After RegVac removes all those entries,
nativeEx build continue working without any problems!


Inside the DLLs is described, which reg entries have to be made.

If registration / install is processed, all these entries are made.

The alternity is to remove the 'do registration' schedule from the script and see whether the system runs.

Peter

#5 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 03:49 PM

Inside the DLLs is described, which reg entries have to be made.

If registration / install is pricessed, all these entries are maded.

The alternity is to remove the 'do registration' schedule from the script
and see whether the system runs.

Peter



Are you going to test it, as I don't know how to do it?

#6 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 05:58 PM

Are you going to test it, as I don't know how to do it?

Go into Explorer script and comment the RegWrite lines which have a 'RunOnce' inside.

Peter

#7 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 06:33 PM

Go into Explorer script and comment the RegWrite lines which have a 'RunOnce' inside.

Peter



Done and no good: continuous rebooting! :thumbsup:

#8 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 06:41 PM

Done and no good: continuous rebooting! :thumbsup:

Looks like you have to live with the rabbish generated at boot time !?!?!?

But see also the positive side of it: It does not enlarge the size of the ISO.

Peter

#9 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 07:19 PM

Looks like you have to live with the rabbish generated at boot time !?!?!?

But see also the positive side of it: It does not enlarge the size of the ISO.

Peter


Are you sure about it?

#10 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 07:21 PM

Are you sure about it?


YES

Peter

#11 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 07:25 PM

YES

Peter


Thank you!

So, I could forget registry cleaning.

#12 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 07:48 PM

So, I could forget registry cleaning.

Not if you would start learning about WB.
There is no need for boot time registration. You can just as well write a script which writes the keys directly into the PE registry and then of course you can decide on a per key basis, if you want/need to write the key or not.

Guess the question is: Is it important enough to you, to invest the neded time and work?

:thumbsup:

#13 phox

phox

    Silver Member

  • .script developer
  • 764 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 08:15 PM

Not if you would start learning about WB.
There is no need for boot time registration. You can just as well write a script which writes the keys directly into the PE registry and then of course you can decide on a per key basis, if you want/need to write the key or not.


I have thought that hivesFactory.Script is doing that.
Whatever method is used, I am surprised that so many
unnecessary entries are generated!

Guess the question is: Is it important enough to you, to invest the neded time and work?

:thumbsup:



No, it's not!

#14 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 January 2008 - 08:49 PM

Whatever method is used, I am surprised that so many
unnecessary entries are generated!

Did you never become excited about Bill G's help for stupid users?

If you write 3 chars into an EXCEL sheet and tab to the next field, then the field is automatically filled to a longer entry of an above row, which starts with the same three chars!

Bill G. thinks that he knows better than you what the contents has to be.

That's how IT should work!

Peter

#15 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 18 January 2008 - 09:01 PM

Guess the question is: Is it important enough to you, to invest the neded time and work?

No, it's not!

Didn't thought so.

:thumbsup:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users