Jump to content











Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

[script] ImDisk


  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#26 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 17 June 2007 - 04:13 PM

I clicked to select all scripts from the root of the project and both ramdisks were added - shouldn't just one script be selected or available to download from the minimum profile for most cases and avoid confusions with double ramdisks? :thumbup:


Mea culpa! :1st:
I already thought about removing RAMDisk from the recommended download.
But I missed to do.
I'll move RAMDisk to 'complete'.
(Maybe it is tested enough and ready to replace RAMDisk. So remove it from the nativeEx_barebone?)

But back to 'User should explicitelly agree'

What about an (or better two) option(s) whether 'depends' and 'exclude' are handled automatically?

Peter

#27 Nuno Brito

Nuno Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10560 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 17 June 2007 - 04:43 PM

You mean an option for asking the end user if he wants to select or deselect needed scripts?


"This script requires ramdisk.script, otherRamdisk.script to be disabled."

"Disable | Cancel"

:1st:

#28 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 17 June 2007 - 04:47 PM

You mean an option for asking the end user if he wants to select or deselect needed scripts?


"This script requires ramdisk.script, otherRamdisk.script to be disabled."

"Disable | Cancel"

:1st:


Oki, if this
  • never is asked again
  • can be changed if the user changes his opinion
I just meant that maybe in 'tools' 'options' there is a checkmark 'auto depends / exclude'
Peter

#29 carfan

carfan

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 196 posts
  •  
    United States

Posted 17 June 2007 - 08:38 PM

Oki, if this

  • never is asked again
  • can be changed if the user changes his opinion
I just meant that maybe in 'tools' 'options' there is a checkmark 'auto depends / exclude'
Peter


i tried to incorporate imdisk into livexp. i get an error from explorer script about needing ram disk or sdi. i replaced explorer script from nativeex barebones and get an error cant create folder when explorer script runs. any ideas?

cafan

#30 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 18 June 2007 - 07:40 AM

i tried to incorporate imdisk into livexp. i get an error from explorer script about needing ram disk or sdi. i replaced explorer script from nativeex barebones and get an error cant create folder when explorer script runs. any ideas?

cafan


There are some other dependencies of explorer!
You need a new script.project, winbuilder must be at lease 071 beta 3 etc.

Use the original explorer and change it's verify.
Replace
If {%$$:Main.Selected%}

 & !{%RAMDisk:Main.Selected%}

 & !{%Boot SDI:Main.Selected%} Then

 "Explorer needs RAMDisk or BootSDI Script";
by
If !{%RAMDisk:Main.Selected%}

 & !{%Boot SDI:Main.Selected%}

 & !{%ImDisk:Main.Selected%} Then

 "Explorer needs RAMDisk, ImDisk or BootSDI Script";

Peter

EDIT: Use the latest verify from nativeEx!

Edited by psc, 18 June 2007 - 10:12 AM.
Additional Info


#31 Garfield

Garfield

    Member

  • .script developer
  • 96 posts
  • Interests:pretty much everything
  •  
    South Africa

Posted 20 July 2007 - 11:03 AM

@Peter

Nice replacement of the RamDrive script :yahoo:

But since ImDisk supports mounting virtual disk images how about registering it to the shell

I did a quick update (didn't change version no) Attached File  ImDisk.Script   72.35KB   311 downloads

Which other extensions should also be added?

#32 Nuno Brito

Nuno Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10560 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 20 July 2007 - 11:31 AM

Thanks - very good! :yahoo:

#33 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 20 July 2007 - 02:02 PM

@Peter

Nice replacement of the RamDrive script :yahoo:

But since ImDisk supports mounting virtual disk images how about registering it to the shell

I did a quick update (didn't change version no) Attached File  ImDisk.Script   72.35KB   311 downloads

Which other extensions should also be added?


Thanks, Garfield, for the great idea :)
After debugging a little bit (replace 2 commas by #$c), I did an upload to the nativeEx server.

Peter

#34 Garfield

Garfield

    Member

  • .script developer
  • 96 posts
  • Interests:pretty much everything
  •  
    South Africa

Posted 20 July 2007 - 02:19 PM

Thanks, Garfield, for the great idea :yahoo:
After debugging a little bit (replace 2 commas by #$c), I did an upload to the nativeEx server.

Peter


Sorry about the 2 commas, it was only supposed to be a proof of concept.

What other image types should also be added?

#35 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 31 January 2008 - 04:53 PM

There has been a long time unrecognized bug in ImDisc.Script.

MedEvil found it today :thumbsup:

If you want to have a FAT or FAT32 ImDisk RAM Disk on the PE, format of the disk does not work..

The fixed script is available on the nativeEx server (core) as version 013

Peter

#36 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 31 January 2008 - 06:41 PM

Thanks for fix and fame! :thumbsup:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users