Jump to content











Photo

Performance comparative table

win7 win8.x win10 performace

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 alacran

alacran

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 473 posts
  •  
    Mexico

Posted 08 August 2015 - 10:03 PM

I want to let you know about this comparative table:

 

JTVkiBM.jpg



#2 sixcentgeorge

sixcentgeorge

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 190 posts
  •  
    France

Posted 09 August 2015 - 07:15 AM

M$ always did that : it eats the cpu and does not optimize the code...

that is the reason linux is getting more and more customers : i add macos to linux-users

 

the worst thing of that results , is despite M$ made a "signature" system of the drivers , where nvidia-ati are surely the best customers of these signatures...; the fps is really not here...



#3 Wonko the Sane

Wonko the Sane

    The Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 13599 posts
  • Location:The Outside of the Asylum (gate is closed)
  •  
    Italy

Posted 09 August 2015 - 10:17 AM

@alacran

Would you be so kind as to provide the source of that comparison?

 

:duff:

Wonko



#4 alacran

alacran

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 473 posts
  •  
    Mexico

Posted 10 August 2015 - 12:09 AM

@ Wonko

 

I am sorry but I can't remember where I got it, just copied the table link and forgot the source, next time I post something will not forget the source.

 

Best Regards

 

 

Edit: This test was made by an end user Mr. Fox, he posted it on a very long thread (853 pages atm) about Win10 build 10240 (RTM) in MDL forum.


Edited by alacran, 10 August 2015 - 02:45 AM.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: win7, win8.x, win10, performace

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users