Jump to content











Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

API has no certification!


Best Answer pscEx , 12 February 2013 - 02:08 PM

Hi paraglider ;) Thank you for your interesting. I never received an email yet. But I can wait. Also, I know pscEx's mail box is not open to all users of this site. Am I wrong ? Best regards :hi:

Sorry, Max!

Because I did not get a PM, I have had the opinion you did not want to PM me.

 

My PM box is not blocked.

Maybe the forum's software locks something.

 

Can you try again?

 

Independent from that I'll PM you.

 

Peter

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
29 replies to this topic

#1 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:05 PM

Hi WinBuilder Developer ;)

 

I can not use the WinBuilder 83.21 on my project. Because It gives an error : "API has no certification!". What is this ? Best regards :hi:



#2 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:21 PM

Winbuilder 83 is experimental and as only intended for use with multipe. However it is easy to get working with other projects. You just have to certify the api script with the latest certify.exe ( version 5.5.4 ).


  • Max_Real Qnx likes this

#3 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 10 February 2013 - 02:25 PM

Thank you paraglider for your answer. But How ?



#4 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:29 PM

You PM PscEx and ask him for a link to the latest certify package ( plus password ) and a signing key ( unique per script developer ). The helpfile with the certify package tells you how to use it.



#5 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:32 PM

Hopefully by the time winbuilder 83 is released as a alpha / beta / release version any signing requirements for the API files will be optional.



#6 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 10 February 2013 - 03:37 PM

Only file I had to sign with certify.exe in win8pese project was Projects\Win8PESE\Build\Macro_Library.script



#7 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 10 February 2013 - 04:41 PM

Hi paraglider ;)

 

Unfortunately, I can not find the mentioned file in the specified location. Can you give me a download link ? Best regards :hi:



#8 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 11 February 2013 - 03:40 AM

Please follow the rules I outlined above. PscEx will email you the link, the password to open the file and the developer specific certification key if you don't already have one. I did this earlier this week and the PM Pscex sent contained a valid link.


  • Max_Real Qnx likes this

#9 Holmes.Sherlock

Holmes.Sherlock

    Gold Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 1444 posts
  • Location:Santa Barbara, California
  •  
    United States

Posted 11 February 2013 - 06:51 PM

Hi paraglider ;)

 

Unfortunately, I can not find the mentioned file in the specified location. Can you give me a download link ? Best regards :hi:

 

Max, just curious to know, is there any specific reason to use WB083 while your project (I think Win8pese) can be built by prior versions of WB, e.g. 082 or 080? As paraglider has pointed out, WB083 is to be used with MultiPE only.



#10 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:09 PM

Please follow the rules I outlined above. PscEx will email you the link, the password to open the file and the developer specific certification key if you don't already have one. I did this earlier this week and the PM Pscex sent contained a valid link.


Hi paraglider ;)

Thank you for your interesting. I never received an email yet. But I can wait.
Also, I know pscEx's mail box is not open to all users of this site. Am I wrong ? Best regards :hi:

#11 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:26 PM

Max, just curious to know, is there any specific reason to use WB083 while your project (I think Win8pese) can be built by prior versions of WB, e.g. 082 or 080? As paraglider has pointed out, WB083 is to be used with MultiPE only.

Hi Holmes.Sherlock ;)

I know. Already I do not want the WinBuilder 83 for my old projects. I'm working on a new project (MultiPE Leopard v3). Kind regards :hi:

#12 paraglider

paraglider

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1716 posts
  • Location:NC,USA
  •  
    United States

Posted 12 February 2013 - 12:57 PM

Don't know. He responded to me within 1 day usually much less.



#13 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12688 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:08 PM   Best Answer

Hi paraglider ;) Thank you for your interesting. I never received an email yet. But I can wait. Also, I know pscEx's mail box is not open to all users of this site. Am I wrong ? Best regards :hi:

Sorry, Max!

Because I did not get a PM, I have had the opinion you did not want to PM me.

 

My PM box is not blocked.

Maybe the forum's software locks something.

 

Can you try again?

 

Independent from that I'll PM you.

 

Peter


  • Max_Real Qnx likes this

#14 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 12 February 2013 - 02:44 PM

Hi pscEX ;) Thank you for the link. I'm at work right now. So I will examine your program at my home later. Best regards :hi:

#15 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 12 February 2013 - 10:24 PM

Hi Developer ;)

 

Maybe a useful program for batch processing. Best regards :hi:

 

http://www.maxrealqn...CertifyGuiv1.7z



#16 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12688 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 13 February 2013 - 08:59 AM

I cannot unzip

 

Peter



#17 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 13 February 2013 - 12:17 PM

Hi pscEx ;)

Opps! So sorry. Maybe the 7z archive file is corrupt. Please download latest version of the 7zip archiver software and try again. I can not check the file because of it is currently at my home computer.

http://www.7-zip.org/

If there is any mistake, I will try to fix as soon as possible. Thank you in advance for your understanding. Best regards :hi:

#18 Wonko the Sane

Wonko the Sane

    The Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 13745 posts
  • Location:The Outside of the Asylum (gate is closed)
  •  
    Italy

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:13 PM

Archive verifies wit 7-zip 9.20.

 

:cheers:

Wonko


  • Max_Real Qnx likes this

#19 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:54 PM

Hi Wonko the Sane ;)

Thank you for your feedback. If you like this little program, I can improve it a bit more. Best regards :hi:

#20 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12688 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 13 February 2013 - 02:59 PM

Archive verifies wit 7-zip 9.20.

 

:cheers:

Wonko

I have 9.20 installed.

 

But some associations were still to 4.65 ... :frusty:

 

Peter



#21 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 13 February 2013 - 03:41 PM

I have 9.20 installed.

But some associations were still to 4.65 ...

Peter
Hi pscEx ;)

Hmm yes you might be right. In fact, each program must support backward program unity. But when it comes to the free softwares, feedback may not be beneficial at any time. I think, this is a bug for the 7zip. Best regards :hi:

#22 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12688 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:10 PM

I prefer to call this a "bug in my PC setup"

 

Peter :cheers:



#23 Wonko the Sane

Wonko the Sane

    The Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 13745 posts
  • Location:The Outside of the Asylum (gate is closed)
  •  
    Italy

Posted 13 February 2013 - 06:38 PM

Hi Wonko the Sane ;)

Thank you for your feedback. If you like this little program, I can improve it a bit more. Best regards :hi:

Well, all I did was to check the archive for (possible) corruption.

I am sure it is a handy utility :thumbsup:, but I have no use for it :w00t:.

 

Using a completely unneeded certification tool for something that makes little sense and that additionally requires "begging" to get included in the "private club" is really something I won't like to do (and thank heavens I don' t have a need for, not developing anything Winbuilder based).

 

:cheers:

Wonko



#24 Max_Real Qnx

Max_Real Qnx

    Gold Member

  • Patrician
  • 1382 posts
  • Location:Istanbul
  • Interests:To be or not to be that is the question.
  •  
    Turkey

Posted 13 February 2013 - 09:37 PM

Hi Wonko the Sane ;)

 

Yes, you might be right. But I still think a little to provide an update. I think, maybe pscEx's idea is a step too late for safety of our community. I think this method should have been done much earlier. But what happens disadvantages, it also need to discuss. Best regards :hi:



#25 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12688 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 14 February 2013 - 03:44 PM

is a step too late

 

:dubbio:

The first introduction to that method has been made in 2009: http://reboot.pro/to...ity/#entry76322

At that time Vista PE projects have been in the very beginning, and Win7 was unknown.

The idea was fully supported by the LiveXP development team and Lancelot created the keys for developers asking for it.

After he and some other people decided to make the revolution here, become bakers and forget or fight against their previous "life", I continued as "key generator".

 

Using a completely unneeded certification tool for something that makes little sense

 

:dubbio:

Intelligent people can find the sence in the above link.

If they see only little sence, why they did not give their concerns 4 years ago?

 

BTW: @Wonko: You are well known here as person with sharp and logical behavement.
But due to the above quoted post I have some concerns: Even if something only makes little sence, the tool to perform the "something", cannot be unneeded gererally.

It can only be "not needed" for the individual user, when he decides not to process the "something". :cheers:

 

and that additionally requires "begging" to get included in the "private club

 

:dubbio:

At the stone-aged Lancelot time as well as now, nobody has to beg for a key.

There is no automatism which sends the key to every reboot.pro developer, but a PM of a serious reboot.pro member with the request has been and is still sufficient.

 

 

Peter






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users