Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

Upcoming forum upgrade


  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

#101 Nuno Brito

Nuno Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10544 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 16 August 2011 - 08:25 AM

Well, VIM - at least -

You don't get the console VIM, you get a Web 2.0 one.. :lightbulb:

#102 Wonko the Sane

Wonko the Sane

    The Finder

  • Advanced user
  • 14757 posts
  • Location:The Outside of the Asylum (gate is closed)
  •  
    Italy

Posted 16 August 2011 - 09:41 AM

You don't get the console VIM, you get a Web 2.0 one.. :lightbulb:

Hmmm, It seems too d@mn simple for your current standards.

Why not imposing to run a javascript emulator:
http://bellard.org/jslinux/tech.html
compiling at boot a minimal Linux:
http://bellard.org/tcc/
http://bellard.org/tcc/tccboot.html
in which to start a Qemu:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page
VM in which to run VirtualBox:
http://www.virtualbox.org/
to boot a Windows 8 running Word 2010? (Word 2003 is too d@mn small and fast :whistling:)

:cheers:
Wonko

#103 sbaeder

sbaeder

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:usa - massachusettes
  •  
    United States

Posted 26 August 2011 - 07:08 PM

Now that things are at least a bit more "stable", would it be possible to "sort" the smileys so that the first click brings up the ones we tent to use the most? I know that is subjective, but some sort of order would be better than the seemingly random arrangement we get. I don't know if it is possible to get "smiley picture access" counts, but if it is, that could be used to rank them...

Again, not critical, but would improve "usability"...

Thanks to you and Mikorist for all your efforts here.

Scott

#104 i

i

    Silver Member

  • Advanced user
  • 526 posts
  •  
    United Nations

Posted 26 August 2011 - 07:54 PM

Its nice to see this thread again, i almost forgot....

Amazing thing happened 2 days back with "EDIT" and "Submit" buttons, I added long information to the post, pressed submit and all edited info vanished :w00t: :1st: . It takes 3 clicks on "Edit" button to finally show text input area, the loading animation keeps looping after first 2 clicks.
There you go again, Nuno... :whip:
:rofl:


Now that things are at least a bit more "stable", would it be possible to "sort" the smileys so that the first click brings up the ones we tent to use the most? I know that is subjective, but some sort of order would be better than the seemingly random arrangement we get. I don't know if it is possible to get "smiley picture access" counts, but if it is, that could be used to rank them...

Again, not critical, but would improve "usability"...

Thanks to you and Mikorist for all your efforts here.

Scott

Hooo Noes, I say group them together (like icons) in 4 rows grids (or more, while 1 wide smiley can use 2 rows) with short length scroll bars. How come we still have horizontal page like smileys around? Are those user feedbacks worth nothing? :clap:

#105 sbaeder

sbaeder

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:usa - massachusettes
  •  
    United States

Posted 26 August 2011 - 10:38 PM

I say group them together (like icons) in 4 rows grids (or more, while 1 wide smiley can use 2 rows) with short length scroll bars. How come we still have horizontal page like smileys around? Are those user feedbacks worth nothing?

I don't mind the separate window view, and having the horizontal view at the bottom of the reply box is OK too...more choice! But don't like to have to scroll 3-4 times to get to the ones we all seem to use most often

#106 MedEvil

MedEvil

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 7771 posts

Posted 26 August 2011 - 10:49 PM

Do it like i do and simply start remembering the codes for the smileys you mostly use and type them directly.
It's a lot fater than point and click, even without scrolling.

:cheers:




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users