Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

Install windows 7 using memdisk (drawbacks)


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Vishnu_C

Vishnu_C
  • Members
  • 1 posts
  •  
    India

Posted 25 May 2011 - 08:53 AM

Hi guys,
Booting winpe over pxe using gpxe and able to get the windows 7 installation to work flawlessly. Im using memdisk to boot the entire winpe iso into memory so there are a few drawbacks. For eg. Installing windows 7 into a 512MB pc fails because when winpe iso loads into memory which then consumes around 150MB from the 512 available. ( 512MB - 150MB = 362MB ) Therefore windows 7 installation fails to begin because of the lack of RAM available.
Did anyone figure out how to negate this kind of situation or is there nothing we can do?
Please lemme know...

#2 Sha0

Sha0

    WinVBlock Dev

  • Developer
  • 1682 posts
  • Location:reboot.pro Forums
  • Interests:Booting
  •  
    Canada

Posted 25 May 2011 - 12:16 PM

Hi guys,
Booting winpe over pxe using gpxe and able to get the windows 7 installation to work flawlessly. Im using memdisk to boot the entire winpe iso into memory so there are a few drawbacks. For eg. Installing windows 7 into a 512MB pc fails because when winpe iso loads into memory which then consumes around 150MB from the 512 available. ( 512MB - 150MB = 362MB ) Therefore windows 7 installation fails to begin because of the lack of RAM available.
Did anyone figure out how to negate this kind of situation or is there nothing we can do?
Please lemme know...

Please see "Understanding the double-RAM requirement". Is there a reason why you cannot use iPXE's recent boot .ISO from SAN feature?

#3 sbaeder

sbaeder

    Gold Member

  • .script developer
  • 1338 posts
  • Location:usa - massachusettes
  •  
    United States

Posted 25 May 2011 - 02:29 PM

Did anyone figure out how to negate this kind of situation or is there nothing we can do?
Please lemme know...

Another way is to just "google" for "install windows 7 with less than 512M ram" ;)




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users