bug in autoLocalization
#1
Posted 12 January 2007 - 12:53 PM
Found some errors in processLocalization.script in the LiveXP project. Unfortunately i can't fix them, as they seem to originate in Localize.exe.
In processLocalization.script the variable DRIVELETTER% is used 3 times, insted of %DRIVELETTER%.
Another problem is the 'SendTo' folder, as it is created in 'Documents and Settings' instead of 'Dokumente und Einstellungen'.
Not sure if the fixing of the above will correct this error too or if it is related to the following error, from the WB Log, instead.
INIRead - Failed to read value from: [C:\BootBuilder\WinBuilder053Beta12\Projects\LiveXP\autoTweaks\autoLocalization\processLocalization.script] Section: [Main] Key: [Check] to variable: [%check%]
Happy bug hunting!
#2
Posted 12 January 2007 - 01:52 PM
LiveXP has the version 19 of autoLocalize.Script.In processLocalization.script the variable DRIVELETTER% is used 3 times, insted of %DRIVELETTER%.
The actual version 21 can be found here
(I'll try to update the server)
That is hardcoded in shortcuts.Script and not an issue of autoLocalize.Another problem is the 'SendTo' folder, as it is created in 'Documents and Settings' instead of 'Dokumente und Einstellungen'.
This is a version check; the error occurs when processLocalization.Script is not yet generated.INIRead - Failed to read value from: [C:\BootBuilder\WinBuilder053Beta12\Projects\LiveXP\autoTweaks\autoLocalization\processLocalization.script] Section: [Main] Key: [Check] to variable: [%check%]
Not nice, but does not disturbe correct project generation.
Peter
#3
Posted 12 January 2007 - 02:46 PM
Never occured to me, that the file from the update-server might be out of date.LiveXP has the version 19 of autoLocalize.Script.
The actual version 21 can be found
Thanks, will look into it.That is hardcoded in shortcuts.Script and not an issue of autoLocalize.
OK, thanks PeterThis is a version check; the error occurs when processLocalization.Script is not yet generated.
Not nice, but does not disturbe correct project generation.
#4
Posted 12 January 2007 - 03:15 PM
#5
Posted 12 January 2007 - 03:32 PM
Never occured to me, that the file from the update-server might be out of date.
There is samething with 'Beta' in the URL
Peter
#6
Posted 12 January 2007 - 03:34 PM
Where is my 'Dokumente und Einstellungen' and why do i have now a ProfilesDir?
???
Please some words more!
Maybe a post of the log
Peter
#7
Posted 12 January 2007 - 04:01 PM
I take everything back and say the opposite!???
Please some words more!
Maybe a post of the log
Peter
I'm so used to updating without loosing my settings, that i keep forgetting, that i have to reenable settings in WB when updating.
#8
Posted 12 January 2007 - 04:41 PM
I take everything back and say the opposite!
I'm so used to updating without loosing my settings, that i keep forgetting, that i have to reenable settings in WB when updating.
What about using myOptions?
Peter
#9
Posted 12 January 2007 - 11:57 PM
Peter in the here posted version a path to the Archive folder is still present.LiveXP has the version 19 of autoLocalize.Script.
The actual version 21 can be found
Had you fixed that before uploading to the downloadcenter?
#10
Posted 13 January 2007 - 08:51 AM
Peter in the here posted version a path to the Archive folder is still present.
Had you fixed that before uploading to the downloadcenter?
The processLocalize script is build once and valid vor every project.
Maybe qith the new structure would be better for every project to have its own processLocalize.Script.
Peter
#11
Posted 13 January 2007 - 12:57 PM
You misunderstood, the Archive path is coded into the autoLocalize.Script, but we no longer have an archive folder.The processLocalize script is build once and valid vor every project.
Maybe qith the new structure would be better for every project to have its own processLocalize.Script.
Peter
#12
Posted 13 January 2007 - 01:38 PM
You misunderstood, the Archive path is coded into the autoLocalize.Script, but we no longer have an archive folder.
I can rename it, but it has to be a folder under %basedir% and outside the different projects.
BTW: This version of localization is ice-age. Go to nativeEX.
Peter
#13
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:04 PM
Why? I replaced your %basedir&\archive string with %projectdir% and it works like a charn.I can rename it, but it has to be a folder under %basedir% and outside the different projects.
There is no autoLocalization.script in my nativeEX project and downloader does not show anything missing.BTW: This version of localization is ice-age. Go to nativeEX.
#14
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:10 PM
Why? I replaced your %basedir&\archive string with %projectdir% and it works like a charn.
That's ok, but it brings the same processLocalization script into every project.
Again a question of the new structures.
There is no autoLocalization.script in my nativeEX project and downloader does not show anything missing.
It is a part of the hivesFactory
Peter
#15
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:21 PM
Ah, now i get it! Not, that's an old script, go to nativeEX and use the new one, but use nativeEx instead!It is a part of the hivesFactory
Peter
At the moment, i work on making the standart project work as flawless as possible without actually having to invent own scripts. Just a little bugfixing.
When everything works, i will try to merge it to LiveXP and nativeEX.
PS: nativeEx is a great idea, but unfortunately to many scripts seem not to work yet right with it.
#16
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:26 PM
PS: nativeEx is a great idea, but unfortunately to many scripts seem not to work yet right with it.
That's our job for the near future!
Peter
#17
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:31 PM
Yep, it is, but i think we should also have a stable product for our customers.That's our job for the near future!
Peter
#18
Posted 13 January 2007 - 02:38 PM
Yep, it is, but i think we should also have a stable product for our customers.
Just have a look at the blue lines at bottom
Peter
#19
Posted 13 January 2007 - 03:04 PM
I'm more in favour of the M$ way. Always have an ok product to sell, while working on the superior one!Just have a look at the blue lines at bottom
Peter
#20
Posted 13 January 2007 - 03:13 PM
I saw a lot of products they sold, but I do not remember having ever seen a product ready to sellI'm more in favour of the M$ way. Always have an ok product to sell, ...
And M$ has ??? thousand developers, and we ??
Peter
#21
Posted 13 January 2007 - 03:54 PM
You for the improved version and me for the outdated one.And M$ has ??? thousand developers, and we ??
So we should make faster progress than M$!
#22
Posted 13 January 2007 - 04:15 PM
You for the improved version and me for the outdated one.
So we should make faster progress than M$!
#23
Posted 13 January 2007 - 04:17 PM
#24
Posted 13 January 2007 - 04:44 PM
John
#25
Posted 13 January 2007 - 06:21 PM
I'm not yet so deep into the projects, but i don't think it can or should be done.I have a very serious question : Why do we keep two different projects that do almost the same thing? WE can merge them as MedEvil said. Let's create a barand new project with a different name wich will be compatible with the scripts of both projects.
John
The way i see it:
- LiveXP is the 'easy' clone from BartPE. It's very compatible to BartPE, so plugins can be more easily transformed.
- nativeEX is the new kid on the block with lots of potential, but not as compatible to BARTPE. So, more trouble tranforming plugins.
I think we will eventually move to nativeEX as the main project, but for now it's nice to have LiveXP to see, if the transformation of the plugin to script worked, at least in general.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users