[Links] %baseDir%\Archive\CD&DVD-Burn\CDWriter.script,True,Apps %baseDir%\Archive\RAMdisk\ramdisk.script,True,Apps %baseDir%\Archive\Build\mkISOfs.script,True,Build ...
This will also reduce a bit the hole distribution .zip file
Suggestion for a less complex project
Started by
smiley
, Sep 04 2006 01:36 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1
smiley
-
- .script developer
-
- 905 posts
Silver Member
-
Greece
Posted 04 September 2006 - 01:36 PM
I just got Psc's modifies layout wich moves the most script files into the archive project. The result wass really good.In the default project folder there were only three script files! So I think if all the other link files are realy needed to be as separate files. I mean that they can be into the script.project file in a way like this:
This will also reduce a bit the hole distribution .zip file
This will also reduce a bit the hole distribution .zip file
#2
pscEx
-
- Team Reboot
-
- 12707 posts
Platinum Member
- Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
- Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
-
European Union
Posted 04 September 2006 - 02:34 PM
I just got Psc's modifies layout wich moves the most script files into the archive project. The result wass really good.In the default project folder there were only three script files! So I think if all the other link files are realy needed to be as separate files. I mean that they can be into the script.project file in a way like this:
[Links] %baseDir%\Archive\CD&DVD-Burn\CDWriter.script,True,Apps %baseDir%\Archive\RAMdisk\ramdisk.script,True,Apps %baseDir%\Archive\Build\mkISOfs.script,True,Build ...
This will also reduce a bit the hole distribution .zip file
Peter
#3
Brito
-
- .script developer
-
- 10616 posts
Platinum Member
- Location:boot.wim
- Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
-
European Union
Posted 04 September 2006 - 05:14 PM
That's a good idea wich can be added, but would it really make things less complex?
Having .link files allows to copy only the selected apps into another project - this way one would have to edit script.project to add/remove scripts on each project..
How would you prefer it?
Having .link files allows to copy only the selected apps into another project - this way one would have to edit script.project to add/remove scripts on each project..
How would you prefer it?
#4
smiley
-
- .script developer
-
- 905 posts
Silver Member
-
Greece
Posted 04 September 2006 - 05:33 PM
That's a good idea wich can be added, but would it really make things less complex?
Having .link files allows to copy only the selected apps into another project - this way one would have to edit script.project to add/remove scripts on each project..
How would you prefer it?
No i don't think that it is simpler because you can do it using only winbuilder
, but i have never needed to copy a link.Moreover, when you want to create a link it is far more simple because you don't need to search through the files
#5
pscEx
-
- Team Reboot
-
- 12707 posts
Platinum Member
- Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
- Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
-
European Union
Posted 05 September 2006 - 06:45 AM
I agree to Smiley, but I have an additional suggtestion:
In the link line, add two optional arguments:
an alternate title
an alternate level.
This gives the ability to change the project's GUI individually.
Peter
In the link line, add two optional arguments:
an alternate title
an alternate level.
This gives the ability to change the project's GUI individually.
Peter
#6
pscEx
-
- Team Reboot
-
- 12707 posts
Platinum Member
- Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
- Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
-
European Union
Posted 05 September 2006 - 08:49 AM
We should also consider the multi-link suggestion made by __ in this topic
(__, did I spell your name correctly 2 or 3 underscores )
Peter
(__, did I spell your name correctly 2 or 3 underscores
)Peter
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
