Hi Nuno,
I was waiting a post to get clear view, now I get, thanks taking short time.
Now let's use logic:
- Jaclaz doesn't code winbuilder projects;
- Galapo and Lancelot are stuck to XP;
- PSC keeps on adding understandable changes on winbuilder.exe
No, it is "bending the logic"
. I like calling "Socrates games"
- ...
- NO, we maintaning a PE1 project does not mean we stuck to NT5x based project. I am active on all levels of pe2/3 projects even was very active on w98 project, I do not need to maintain another one. Galapo indireclty helping pe2/3 projects by helping me when I stuck on some cases about pe2/3. From your perpective, everyone should be creating a new project instead of using or contributing others.
With this perpective, An introduction to bootland header will be nice:
"Well come to boot-land, we provide exbuilder to make your own project but advice you never use anyother project, to name what you do as 'project' you must support all sources Nuno likes, and never complain about compatibility of exbuilder, we assure you at least in 3 releases your project will fail, you are welcomed"
.
but to give more right impression better write in exbuilder way:
#$qWell#$scome#$sto#$sboot-land#$c#$swe#$sprovide#$sexbuilder#$sto#$smake#$syour#$sown
#$sproject#$sbut#$sadvice#$syou#$snever#$suse#$sanyother#$sproject#$c#$sto#$sname#$swhat
#$syou#$sdo#$sas#$s'project'#$syou#$smust#$ssupport#$sall#$ssources#$sNuno#$slikes#$c#$sand
#$snever#$scomplain#$sabout#$scompatibility#$sof#$sexbuilder#$c#$swe#$sassure#$syou#$sat
#$sleast#$sin#$s3#$sreleases#$syour#$sproject#$swill#$sfail#$c#$syou#$sare#$swelcomed"
- only you understand since you have the secret hand shaking, none of others can even understand since none knows.
as written above and before and before, rerererewriting:
...
I for one am tired of having to go through an entire project to update scripts for changed syntax in order to support a new WB, especially when reasons for altered syntax are crucially not supplied. For example:
http://www.boot-land...?...st&p=100516
http://www.boot-land...?...st&p=102564
http://www.boot-land...?...st&p=100600
This just drives project developers into just picking a WB version and sticking with it and no longer supporting newer versions. This is the case with LiveXP, where supported versions are 077rc2 and 080 with no plans to support a new version unless backwards compatibility is retained
I for one am tired of having to go through an entire project to update scripts for changed syntax in order to support a new WB, especially when reasons for altered syntax are crucially not supplied.
....
Since your last post clears what your final decision:
It stopped because we failed on what was most important: listening to the community.
and you decide continuing deaf. Well done, I am fine with that. I already learned this fact when wb080 released and never had hope for a change.
We need stability, we don't need to rewrite projects and scripts at each new release of wb.
and you decide no need stability, Well done, I am fine again with that.
With final decisions, I am guessing new wb release coming very soon. Maybe tonight or even in some minutes
Usual final words: I do not have a request from nb development about exbuilder, only stop writing LIES and POST GAMES pointing/implying Lancelot and/or LiveXP (any method). I will be much more happy not spending time on answering these Socrates games
.
edit: "enters" added to exbuilder type writing due to malfunctions of boot-land, some incorrect words fixed.