BTW: You such an unbelievable dump idiot peter.
Blow me!
All nativeEx URLs are no longer available.
Peter
Posted 19 May 2010 - 03:53 PM
BTW: You such an unbelievable dump idiot peter.
Blow me!
Posted 19 May 2010 - 04:25 PM
If you want people to respect you don't act so childish.All nativeEx URLs are no longer available.
Posted 19 May 2010 - 04:42 PM
I personally do not need any respect from individual forum's members. I got enough of that during my commercial time of business.If you want people to respect you don't act so childish.
Seeing the latest published RC1 beeing called 'trash' gives me some emotions.Well interesting to came today here and see you turn my nice project into a test of the latests WB trash version.
Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:25 PM
And you remove those solutions from 100% of the forum members because 1% doesn't respect you and your work?In this forum I only do my best to offer solutions which work for 99% of the forum's members.
....
nativeEx closed for the publish, as told above.
Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:43 PM
Why not?And you remove those solutions from 100% of the forum members because 1% doesn't respect you and your work?
Posted 19 May 2010 - 05:53 PM
Why not?
I decide what I offer to the community.
And it is MY decision to stop with certain offers.
Posted 19 May 2010 - 07:15 PM
Posted 20 May 2010 - 05:56 AM
Peter, %ISOFile% has just been the example. There's other areas where the RC is not backwards-compatible as well. I used %ISOFile% as a focused example showing that again the move to a new stable version is again bringing the same story of lack of backwards compatibility. Not because of new features, but because of changes to basic rules of syntax and what can and cannot be done. I'm getting the feeling from the example of %ISOFile% that nothing about WB development is going to change anytime soon. There's no plan in place to avoid issues such as this arising again -- projects developers seem to have to just live with the fact that WB stables are just not meant to be backwards-compatible. Something such as %ISOFile% can be changed over night, breaking compatibility, without being consulted about this.The issue here is that the 1% (or 2% / 3% - see the other posts about %ISOFile% -) are trying to declare a new version as bad, because it demands 2 minutes of adapting some existing scripts.
And of course, the adapted scripts will work with older WB versions!
Posted 07 June 2010 - 03:26 PM
Posted 07 June 2010 - 03:37 PM
Not finally. I only wanted to give some guys the opportunityto think about, that cooperation may be better than fight.Does this mean that all Nativex Projects are being discontinued?
I'll have a look at tools and make that ones available which are necessary for nativeEx_win7.I am getting all sorts of download errors for missing files in Nativex Core, and Nativex Tools. Will Nativex Win7 run without them?
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users