#1
Posted 18 September 2011 - 11:39 AM
We now have a forum section dedicated exclusively to WinBuilder projects based on Windows 8.
You find it at http://reboot.pro/forum/133/
- Max_Real Qnx likes this
#2
Posted 18 September 2011 - 12:43 PM
May be small but a big step to the future. I wish good luck to everyone for new projects. Because the people of this forum deserve better projects. Best regards
- Brito likes this
#3
Posted 19 September 2011 - 02:03 PM
- Brito likes this
#4
Posted 19 September 2011 - 02:06 PM
I am downloading the Windows 8 preview as we speak. Will try out later tonight at my personal computer to see how it works.
Thanks for the screenshots you posted earlier.
#5
Posted 19 September 2011 - 02:48 PM
- Brito likes this
#6
Posted 19 September 2011 - 02:53 PM
#7
Posted 19 September 2011 - 03:12 PM
#8
Posted 19 September 2011 - 03:23 PM
#9
Posted 19 September 2011 - 03:43 PM
- Brito likes this
#10
Posted 19 September 2011 - 03:48 PM
#11
Posted 19 September 2011 - 06:06 PM
"Windows Server 2008 R2 is built on Windows NT 6.1, the same core operating system used with the client-oriented Windows 7".
It would simply be more accurate not to mix up Vista and Win 7 cores, since there is significant difference btw 2008 and 2008R2 Servers setup, features and operation. That is obviously not related to Service Packs: now its SP1 for R2, there will be SP2... But there will be no R3, unless based on Win 8 core.
#12
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:52 AM
Under 7 there is no successor for the server industry after 2008.
Funny enough that even the Windows 8 preview comes identified as NT 6.
#13
Posted 20 September 2011 - 01:33 PM
the version number for 8 is 6.2 where 7 is 6.1 and vista is 6.0Since Vista and 2008 came out during the a very close time span, they were grouped together. A bit like XP and 2003.
Under 7 there is no successor for the server industry after 2008.
Funny enough that even the Windows 8 preview comes identified as NT 6.
suggesting that 8 is considered and incremental update to Win7
if that interests anyone...
#14
Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:13 PM
Since XP came in NT5, Vista as NT6 then shouldn't Win7 be NT7 as well as Win8 use NT8?
Oh well.. Thanks for the tidybit of information.
#15
Posted 20 September 2011 - 02:34 PM
Win2k was NT5.
#16
Posted 20 September 2011 - 03:33 PM
We did had a Win 3.5 and 3.11 along with a Win2 or Win1.
#17
Posted 20 September 2011 - 04:04 PM
Windows 3.11
Windows 3.5
Windows 4.0
Windows 7
Windows 8
A long time later!
Windows 95
Windows 98
A long, long time later!
Windows 2000
#18
Posted 20 September 2011 - 07:10 PM
- Windows NT 3.1
- Windows NT 3.5
- Windows NT 3.51
- Windows NT 4.0
- Windows 2000 (NT 5.0)
- Windows XP (NT 5.1)
- Windows XP x64 (NT 5.2)
- Windows Vista (NT 6.0)
- Windows 7 (NT 6.1)
- Windows 8 (NT 6.2)
Nice Graphic ----> http://upload.wikime...Family_Tree.svg
=====================
windows 7 isn't really even windows version 7 even if you only could NT based releases.
- Brito likes this
#19
Posted 20 September 2011 - 11:26 PM
Thanks for the NT timeline homes32
-- I actually forced a BSOD on Windows 8 and noticed they tried to make it look less intimidating lol, I have a screenshot of it somewhere... I extracted the crash dump back over to my Windows 7 desktop for analysis and it seems nothing has changed with the log
#20
Posted 21 September 2011 - 12:19 AM
metro is garbage. very cumbersome and unproductive on a desktop PC-- I actually forced a BSOD on Windows 8 and noticed they tried to make it look less intimidating lol, I have a screenshot of it somewhere... I extracted the crash dump back over to my Windows 7 desktop for analysis and it seems nothing has changed with the log
Haven't looked at the BSOD or crash reporting stuff yet. but Kernal panic will always take the cake for most intimidating death screen!
#21
Posted 21 September 2011 - 01:01 AM
#22
Posted 24 September 2011 - 12:34 PM
There will be progressively more forum publications coming about using VMs like Hyper-V, VMWare, Virtual PC, Qemu etc., booting virtual and physical disks in various environments, system deployment by using virtual disks, and virtualized computer infrastructure. So its better to gather all that material in a single section for easier accessibility.
#23
Posted 24 September 2011 - 01:48 PM
We already have a section entitled "PC Emulators" at http://reboot.pro/forum/62/
How about if we rename this section to "virtualization" and move it to the Windows section?
Or a new section makes more sense?
#24
Posted 24 September 2011 - 02:52 PM
#25
Posted 24 September 2011 - 02:54 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: news
news
Groups →
Community forum →
News →
Helping ReactOSStarted by Brito , 18 Oct 2011 news |
|
|
||
news
Groups →
Community forum →
News →
Links directory available!Started by Brito , 08 Sep 2011 news |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users