Jump to content











Photo
- - - - -

MOA...why not use xp or vista.


  • Please log in to reply
107 replies to this topic

#101 Oleg_II

Oleg_II

    Frequent Member

  • Advanced user
  • 298 posts
  • Location:Somewhere in the East

Posted 22 October 2007 - 01:37 AM

Oleg - this "feature" is strictly optional.
If you add 3 entries to the moa.ini configuration file - it will boot in this mode.

So I can turn it off?

This is not useful for repair - system rescue usage at all.

Why not? :cheers: I boot it on a computer with failed HDD, mount needed partition in VMWare guest without phisical write accessibility and try to get lost data using all available means and don't afraid to make things worse :cheers:

It maybe useful in constellations where you want to allow strangers access to a preconfigured VM
without having to be afraid that they can mess it up.

That what I meant: this option is good for usual users, but I want to mess up :cheers:

#102 sanbarrow

sanbarrow

    Silver Member

  • Developer
  • 788 posts
  • Location:Germany - Sauerland

Posted 22 October 2007 - 02:17 AM

[BOOT]

defaultCheatCode=lean

defaultRAMdriveSize=8

moahome_ramsize=16

start_fbwf=late

start_sshd=yes

start_vmdks=yes

start_hwpnp=yes

start_audiosrv=no

start_eventlog=yes

start_msi=yes

moa_timeout=10

start_vgasafe=yes

start_kiosk=yes

start_kioskVM=yes

start_explorer=no

To get messup-mode just set the 2 kiosk-lines to no :cheers:

updated embedded video:
http://sanbarrow.com...kiosk-mode.html

#103 sanbarrow

sanbarrow

    Silver Member

  • Developer
  • 788 posts
  • Location:Germany - Sauerland

Posted 24 October 2007 - 07:40 PM

:cheers:

Original question : MOA - why not use VistaPE ? is solved now.

MOA can use VISTAPE

http://sanbarrow.com...ad-vistape.html

#104 Brito

Brito

    Platinum Member

  • .script developer
  • 10616 posts
  • Location:boot.wim
  • Interests:I'm just a quiet simple person with a very quiet simple life living one day at a time..
  •  
    European Union

Posted 24 October 2007 - 08:06 PM

:cheers: :cheers:


Nice work and thanks for posting the video - really helps to quickly view it in action.. :ok:

#105 pscEx

pscEx

    Platinum Member

  • Team Reboot
  • 12707 posts
  • Location:Korschenbroich, Germany
  • Interests:What somebody else cannot do.
  •  
    European Union

Posted 24 October 2007 - 08:09 PM

:cheers:

Original question : MOA - why not use VistaPE ? is solved now.

MOA can use VISTAPE

http://sanbarrow.com...ad-vistape.html


Does that mean that I should forget my XP (nativeEx) trials?
I'm still fighting with 'cannot init FIPS' when starting VMWare.

Peter

#106 sanbarrow

sanbarrow

    Silver Member

  • Developer
  • 788 posts
  • Location:Germany - Sauerland

Posted 24 October 2007 - 09:20 PM

Hey Peter - this was meant to be a joke :cheers:

VistapE was just started as a VM - thats a complete different story.
Peter this has nothing to do with your script - if I can do anything to help you let me know.
I don't have enough pebuilder experience to know how to test myself - but I am at your service when ever you have questions

:cheers:

#107 sanbarrow

sanbarrow

    Silver Member

  • Developer
  • 788 posts
  • Location:Germany - Sauerland

Posted 26 October 2007 - 12:52 AM

Nuno - and everybody else :cheers: watch this
http://sanbarrow.com...tualcenter.html

Now this is a full blown 2003 VM with a database and so on ... next is to boot a couple of VMs and start a full domain from a LiveCD :cheers:

#108 sanbarrow

sanbarrow

    Silver Member

  • Developer
  • 788 posts
  • Location:Germany - Sauerland

Posted 27 October 2007 - 07:45 PM

:cheers: :cheers: :cheers:

Can a Winbuilder PE use a network-share instead of a ramdisk ?

Doesn't look good :cheers:

Moa does this flawlessly (mostly)
http://sanbarrow.com...topic.php?t=915




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users