Has gate been open for a while?
Peter
Posted 07 May 2014 - 11:26 AM
No.
Wonko has resolved to only post if really needed (i.e. to correct some blatantly incorrect information) or on threads posted by those he would call friends.
You are currently in the list as "friend", let me know if this is not accurate and your name will be removed ASAP.
jaclaz
Posted 07 May 2014 - 01:43 PM
Welcome back jaclaz
Posted 07 May 2014 - 03:33 PM
Welcome back jaclaz
jaclaz is not "back", Wonko (the Sane) found it funny to reply in third person, that's it.
Wonko
Posted 07 May 2014 - 03:46 PM
back is back, even if just for a second
Posted 07 May 2014 - 06:35 PM
Identity Crisis.....
Posted 07 May 2014 - 11:01 PM
Checking if Peter placed this post was placed under "news" -> Done.
Nothing to else be done, Jaclaz has been officially sighted for some seconds. Now we can go home and wait for the next sighting.
Posted 02 April 2019 - 03:28 AM
No.
Wonko has resolved to only post if really needed (i.e. to correct some blatantly incorrect information) Mutuelles senior or on threads posted by those he would call friends.
You are currently in the list as "friend", let me know if this is not accurate and your name will be removed ASAP.
jaclaz
Wise decision, but woko can also publish news not to remain silent you do not think.
Edited by erwan.l, 02 April 2019 - 04:25 PM.
Posted 02 April 2019 - 03:03 PM
No Sirs, we want Wonko back out.
Posted 02 April 2019 - 03:36 PM
No Sirs, we want Wonko back out.
Antonino,
Luciad13 is a SPAMmer, as you can easily understand by the embedded link in the edited quote he/she posted.
Replying to SPAMmers and their nonsense posts is only helping them seem legitimate users.
Wonko
Posted 02 April 2019 - 03:41 PM
sorry about that, I did not know it.
Posted 02 April 2019 - 03:57 PM
sorry about that, I did not know it.
No prob , you will soon learn to identify them at a glance.
Hints:
1) first post is a reply to an old thread <- always ask yourself WHY someone would join the board only to leave an unsubstantial comment
2) the contents are gibberish or anyway in broken English or out of topic
3) one or more links are embedded, either in the reply or in an edited quote of a previous post
#2 is actually more a state of mind than a valid SPAMmer detection rule as we have quite a few members that for one reason or the other might easily trigger an alarm if we take it too literally.
Wonko
Posted 02 April 2019 - 04:29 PM
And on top of that, a supposedly french spammer !
Or shall I say a "spammeur"
What would be the best attitude with these?
Hide the post? delete it? ban the user (even if by looking at the ip used, it is probably useless).
I usually, as a minimum, edit/break the url just in case it leads to a dodgy web site.
Posted 02 April 2019 - 05:44 PM
No "best" attitude that I know of.And on top of that, a supposedly french spammer !
Or shall I say a "spammeur"
What would be the best attitude with these?
Hide the post? delete it? ban the user (even if by looking at the ip used, it is probably useless).
I usually, as a minimum, edit/break the url just in case it leads to a dodgy web site.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users