LiveXP not so live?
#1
Posted 17 August 2009 - 02:49 AM
#2
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:04 AM
http://www.boot-land...?showtopic=4111
btw using pe as os is not such a good thing to do . it is meant to be for emergency use ( and ofc with tweaks and bits to look like real xp )
#3
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:17 AM
Well, it looks like I've hit another barrier. Says there's a problem with the registry, which I now realise is located in config/system. Anyone have an idea why it could be causing a problem?
#4
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:43 AM
I guess you dont read posts sent to you carelfullyWell, I'm afraid BootSDI isn't an option, since I don't have server 2003.
http://www.boot-land...?...ost&p=74735
#5
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:53 AM
#6
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:04 AM
no idea !, nothing missing here causing trouble.So do you happen to know what's making windows thing the registry is corrupt or missing?
#7
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:17 AM
And, can you detail for me what magic LiveXP works on windows in order to get it to boot up?
#8
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:28 AM
(and faster with bootsdi but i guess for now this is not an option , besides also good when booting with ufd or harddrive (check post 155) but ufd seems not an option for you too )
No magic, LiveXP is a PE with lots of improvements.
#9
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:31 AM
#10
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:43 AM
From what you write, I guess you have a windows installed on your pc which have problems (**I dont know) on booting. (ps: maybe my english too poor)
With booting LiveXP (which is another os based on xp or 2k3) you can access the problematic windows (which is offline during access) and make some fixes on files, mbr, registry or recoveries..... A fine tool
So far I focus on problems with LiveXP and your problem beyond my focus.
Maybe you should open a topic here
http://www.boot-land...hp?showforum=71
Defining your problem properly (take your time, write in detail, "I have a problem" is not enough for others to understand and most of us do not use native language English) so Windows boot experts may give some advices, than maybe you can use LiveXP to apply advices.
Good luck
#11
Posted 17 August 2009 - 04:50 AM
#12
Posted 17 August 2009 - 10:22 AM
How to put a PE on a HDD, has been covered several times in the forum.
One requires a XP bootsector to make the drive bootable, setupldr renamed to ntldr and moved to the root together with ntdetect, if i remember right and the i386 folder renamed to minint. Done!
#13
Posted 17 August 2009 - 10:31 AM
Some more details here:One requires a XP bootsector to make the drive bootable, setupldr renamed to ntldr and moved to the root together with ntdetect, if i remember right and the i386 folder renamed to minint. Done!
http://www.boot-land...?...7739&st=154
jaclaz
#14
Posted 17 August 2009 - 02:42 PM
#15
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:08 PM
#16
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:21 PM
P.S. It would be nice to have the normal windows bootloader, so I can go into safemode.
EDIT: And I think it was remove txtsetup.sif that actually got it working so far
#17
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:42 PM
Well, if instead of a PE you would build a "Full" XP on USB you can have the "normal windows bootloader" (and SAFE MODE) allright.P.S. It would be nice to have the normal windows bootloader, so I can go into safemode.
If you want lemon juice you'd better squeeze lemons instead of carrots. (but on the other hand if you want carrot juice, squeezing lemons won't work well).
jaclaz
#18
Posted 17 August 2009 - 03:45 PM
#19
Posted 17 August 2009 - 05:39 PM
P.S. If a mod would be kind enough to move this topic over to the forum that was suggested a page back, that would also be great.
#20
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:05 PM
So I guess all I need someone to tell me is what the difference is between the NTLDR that comes standard with windows installations and the one that's provided with LiveXP, since I noticed using one or the other either gives me that registry error or boots up most of the way. Oh, also, if someone knows the answer to that lsass.exe error, that would be great.
P.S. If a mod would be kind enough to move this topic over to the forum that was suggested a page back, that would also be great.
I would gladly move the thread whenever appropriate if only I could understand WHAT are you trying to do.
Normal NT based system (NT/2k/XP/2003) booting sequence:
MBR->BOOTSECTOR->NTLDR->NTDETECT.COM->BOOT.INI->boot Windows (usually from \WINNT or \WINDOWS)
PE 1.x build (based on XP/2003) booting sequence:
(MBR->)BOOTSECTOR->SETUPLDR.BIN->NTDETECT.COM->.SIF file (usually TXTSETUP.SIF or WINNT.SIF-> boot PE (usually from \I386 on CD/DVD or from \minint on HD)
Windows is NOT PE and PE is NOT Windows.
LiveXP, notwithstanding it's INACCURATE name, is a PE.
jaclaz
#21
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:12 PM
#22
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:24 PM
Which files exist at hard disk already?
I understand, there are some windows files already.
Do you have a full windows installed at the same partition?
Do you like ot add LiveXP to the same partition?
How did you do this so far? Write more details.
#23
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:41 PM
Basically, I think it would be cool to just mess around with a PE that doesn't reset every time to computer turns off, so more of a closer-to-real windows installation. So what I've done so far is copied to i386 directory over from LiveXP, renamed it to minint, added necessary boot files to the root, and so far it sorta works. Pretty much any file that was in my LiveXP build is on the hard disk, or virtual hard disk in this case. (Since I'm running it in VMWare.)
No, nothing was originally installed on that partition. And yes, I have added livexp to the only partition. And I pretty much did it like I said a paragraph up.
All I'm hoping you guys can tell me is why it's giving me the error from lsass.exe saying it cannot find the module.
#24
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:50 PM
Which files did you added to the root?added necessary boot files to the root
This was a secret so far. Increase RAM at virtual machine.or virtual hard disk in this case. (Since I'm running it in VMWare.)
#25
Posted 17 August 2009 - 06:59 PM
Why do you suggest increasing the Vm memory? I don't see why this should be using any more memory than on the cd, infact, this should be using less. Remember, the CD has to mount the mem disk as well, but I'll increase it anyways.
EDIT: Ok, I upped the memory from 512MB too 700 something, but that didn't fix the lsass.exe error.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users