477 replies to this topic

[antonino61]

in the meantime, my test revealed 0 duplicates on C:\ - does this conform with what u have just said?

[antonino61]

Well, folks, I guess I have to enthuse at Wimb's skills even further, as I have just discovered that, on updating a vhd and "baking" a corresponding wim, the problem of trying to re-apply the new wim to the same original vhd (in order to avoid changing names and stuff from the default procedure) seems to have disappeared - the procedure automatically calls for a reformat of the vhd and it just re-applies it and the updated vhd reboots spick&span - none of the crashes that erratically happened with the earliest versions of vhd_wimboot, whether as wimboot or as full vhd. So this time, at least with this latest version (5.3, I guess, and I do not know if iti is also the case with the most recent ones (e.g. 5.0-5.2)), wimb went "preterintentional" (beyond his own modest intentions). Attaboy Wimb!

[antonino61]

well, folks, there might be new frontiers in vhd size shrinking - pls check the last post in get-alladafluff-out.