Adsense layout debug
#1
Posted 20 July 2009 - 01:42 PM
#2
Posted 20 July 2009 - 02:33 PM
Please detail more about your system so that I can replicate this issue.
I need to know:
- OS & version
- Browser & version
- Window width in pixels (of the browser window)
#3
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:02 PM
Browser window maximized by 1024*768 Resolution.
#4
Posted 20 July 2009 - 08:56 PM
It's working fine for Firefox 3 and Opera 9.5 users.
Maybe it's better to start a new topic at site feedback to properly debug this issue.
#5
Posted 20 July 2009 - 09:06 PM
As soon as the google bar got moved below the page numbers, they slightly overlapped.
#6
Posted 20 July 2009 - 11:15 PM
I'm currently testing with the latest versions and the portion you mention is correctly displayed but it's difficult to keep compatibility with older versions.
In either case, I'll test other positions inside the webpage until this is solved.
#7
Posted 21 July 2009 - 12:34 AM
Where the older Browsers squeezed things together to make the page width fit the top width, the new FF does not care about stuff like that.
Wish i could show you, but the server denies again uploading to me.
The rendered page in FF3 changes page width 2 times.
So overall there is something wrong with the page design, imo and how the page ends up on screen, depends purely on how the used browser tries to fix the problem.
#8
Posted 21 July 2009 - 08:10 AM
Please log out and test to see if it is no longer breaking the page design.
Thanks.
#9
Posted 21 July 2009 - 11:49 AM
Give me some minutes and i will post some pictures to show you what goes wrong.
#10
Posted 21 July 2009 - 12:40 PM
Pictures from today. IE6 - Adsense at the bottom.
The page head with the login fits perfectly into the page width.
The navigation bar however breaks now also in the older browser the layout.
There is also a glitch at the bottom, where the width doesn't fit the top page width nor the page width at the navigation bar.
I think adsense made more sense at the top of the page, if it is only on the very first page of a topic.
Hope this helps to track down the problem.
#11
Posted 21 July 2009 - 12:59 PM
These ad dimensions are a standard size, I'm hoping to change the default boot land skin later to the end of this year and maybe then will be a good time to implement a visual prepared for these things.
#12
Posted 21 July 2009 - 02:17 PM
Second, slim down the navigation bar to fit with the rest of the page.
The reason i didn't use the new default skin is, because of the navigation bar taking up almost half my screen, leaving very little space to view the actual content i'm interested in.
For the frame at the bottom no idea, what has gone wrong there.
#13
Posted 21 July 2009 - 02:34 PM
Yes, I understand you and unfortunately it's difficult to modify the navigation bar width at this moment. This will likely be taken into consideration when testing the implementation of a newer skin. Many details in forum usage might certainly be improved.slim down the navigation bar to fit with the rest of the page.
The reason i didn't use the new default skin is, because of the navigation bar taking up almost half my screen, leaving very little space to view the actual content i'm interested in.
It would perhaps be more effective to place directly beneath the first made topic but it's not looking very well either so perhaps the bottom position is the place where it is less likely to cause any disturbances.My suggestion for a fix would be, to have the adsense on top again, but change the page number field to have a bigger canvas so that the adsense does not overlap the page numbers when the adsense get pushed below or to set it be default to be below/above the page numbers. No idea how good or stupid that would look in big resolutions.
#14
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:33 PM
I'm hoping to change the default boot land skin later to the end of this year and maybe then will be a good time to implement a visual prepared for these things.
AGAIN?
jaclaz
#15
Posted 21 July 2009 - 04:48 PM
YES!AGAIN?
-------------------------
Later this year we'll be updating the skin from the current "Windows Vista" state onto an improved "Windows 7" state.
Analogous to the improvement felt by users when moving from Vista to Win7, readers of the forum should expect the aforementioned features that are currently available "by design" to be substantially innovating towards the most modern forum structure available in the known boot disk world.
However, rest assured that users of the classical skin may remain using the classical "Windows 2000" state for the sake of stability and some peace of mind without need to update their browsers to the latest versions..
Just kidding, will certainly try to add a better compatibility across different browsers and we do try to dust off our visual at least once a year as you might remember.
#16
Posted 21 July 2009 - 05:22 PM
I'm not a marketing expert, but i believe the point of adds is to be in your way not out of it.so perhaps the bottom position is the place where it is less likely to cause any disturbances.
#17
Posted 21 July 2009 - 05:23 PM
Later this year we'll be updating the skin from the current "Windows Vista" state onto an improved "Windows 7" state.
Which in other words implies that after all I was right, I guess the above may imply that just like the users are feeling an improvement in Windows 7, they felt (mostly ) a degradation with Vista (and the new skin).
Analogous to the improvement felt by users when moving from Vista to Win7, readers of the forum should expect the aforementioned features that are currently available "by design" to be substantially innovating towards the most modern forum structure available in the known boot disk world.
"substantially innovating"?
"towards the most modern"?
"structure available in the known"?
You can tell on my behalf the teacher of your "English as a language for propaganda and marketing" course that he is doing a great job
jaclaz
#18
Posted 21 July 2009 - 06:41 PM
Well, don't know about a future in marketing but I definitively foresee a good career in stand-up comedy if I continue "innovating" at this rate..You can tell on my behalf the teacher of your "English as a language for propaganda and marketing" course that he is doing a great job
But seriously speaking, the web2.0 skin has a good visual but also has some defects that need to be solved or replaced altogether with a newer skin that provides good functionality and reasonably modern look to keep up with the trends.
I planned these changes to occur with some luck towards the end of the year.
Yet, the newer generation of users will only prefer Windows Vista instead of Windows 2000 and the XP users will soon follow the upgrade path to Windows 7 that is not so different from Vista when you take some time to look under the hood without all the marketing bells&whistles.Which in other words implies that after all I was right, I guess the above may imply that just like the users are feeling an improvement in Windows 7, they felt (mostly ) a degradation with Vista (and the new skin)
The new skin provided a modern and unique look along with a good side bar to place informations and the site will continue changing to other skins as time moves over the coming years.
#19
Posted 21 July 2009 - 08:01 PM
Lies! Lies!and the XP users will soon follow the upgrade path to Windows 7
#20
Posted 21 July 2009 - 09:04 PM
Marketing!Lies! Lies!
#21
Posted 23 July 2009 - 10:37 PM
Marketing!
Do you want to meet Natalya_ru, subscribe and add to your msn .
#22
Posted 23 July 2009 - 11:03 PM
You're lucky..
#23
Posted 23 July 2009 - 11:11 PM
Well, lucky maybe, seeing a girl picture on boot-land.net made me a big smile .
Here is a scenerio: "I have to boot blabla, himm there is a website boot-land, let me click, ohhhhh yess russian girls are good lets search russian girl websites"
#24
Posted 23 July 2009 - 11:58 PM
But some diversity would be nice, thought I think you're still a lucky person.
Here's how the same publicity space looks for US citizens:
They get stuck with insurances and credits or something like that..
#25
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:11 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users