i am very sorry for idiotically posting at first in the wrong place and way. i hope to make it better by this post.
the tool was located here: web.telia.com/~u75404712/downloads/ or /filer
mentioned e.g. here:
http://www.boot-land...?...ost&p=51489
i would be grateful if these scripts would be reachable again. sorry again for misposting.
EDIT: i removed a second request from this post. sorry for combining them.
[FOUND] versatile-floppy-image
Started by
caze
, Jan 24 2009 11:30 AM
4 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 24 January 2009 - 11:30 AM
#2
Posted 24 January 2009 - 12:21 PM
sorry again for misposting.
No prob , it's a new approach, a misunderstanding can always happen.
i hope to make it better by this post.
Hmmm. definitely better, but still.....
Then I will either,
strikethe original not working link and supply a new link to the archive on http://historical.boot-land.net/ where I will upload the file orstrikethe link explaining why it is broken and why the project is not anymore available and change the title to:[FOUND] BartAIO 1.5a
To recap:
If you miss anything:
- make a single new topic with title starting with [LOST] and the app/.script/project/whatever name
- make in it one single post containing a link to the post where the broken link is
The idea does not seem to me that difficult to grasp and comply with :
1 Single New Topic=1 Single Title=1 Single lost app OR .script OR project OR whatever, containing possibly multiple references to the SAME, SINGLE "something" that was lost
Let's say that I can find just ONE out of the TWO requests you made in the SAME post.
Would I need to change the title to [PARTIALLY FOUND]?
How would one quickly see WHICH one has been found?
I know I look unneededly picky, but I am just trying to create something simple, working, and easily readable.
In other words, I actually am picky, but not uneededly.
It would be great if you could start again TWO separate topics for the TWO things that were lost.
The GOOD thing is that you are procuring some good examples that will probably avoid similar "not-complying" topics in the future.
jaclaz
#3
Posted 24 January 2009 - 12:35 PM
oh my.
(i was of the opinion that as both came from the same source, they might be found together if at all.) sorry again.
(i was of the opinion that as both came from the same source, they might be found together if at all.) sorry again.
#4
Posted 05 March 2009 - 06:29 PM
bump!
jaclaz
jaclaz
#5
Posted 09 March 2009 - 08:21 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users