105 replies to this topic

[Brito]

Well, VIM - at least -

You don't get the console VIM, you get a Web 2.0 one..

[Wonko the Sane]

You don't get the console VIM, you get a Web 2.0 one..

Hmmm, It seems too d@mn simple for your current standards.

Why not imposing to run a javascript emulator:
http://bellard.org/jslinux/tech.html
compiling at boot a minimal Linux:
http://bellard.org/tcc/
http://bellard.org/tcc/tccboot.html
in which to start a Qemu:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Main_Page
VM in which to run VirtualBox:
http://www.virtualbox.org/
to boot a Windows 8 running Word 2010? (Word 2003 is too d@mn small and fast )


Wonko

[sbaeder]

Now that things are at least a bit more "stable", would it be possible to "sort" the smileys so that the first click brings up the ones we tent to use the most? I know that is subjective, but some sort of order would be better than the seemingly random arrangement we get. I don't know if it is possible to get "smiley picture access" counts, but if it is, that could be used to rank them...

Again, not critical, but would improve "usability"...

Thanks to you and Mikorist for all your efforts here.

Scott

[L A M A]

Its nice to see this thread again, i almost forgot....

Amazing thing happened 2 days back with "EDIT" and "Submit" buttons, I added long information to the post, pressed submit and all edited info vanished . It takes 3 clicks on "Edit" button to finally show text input area, the loading animation keeps looping after first 2 clicks.
There you go again, Nuno...

Now that things are at least a bit more "stable", would it be possible to "sort" the smileys so that the first click brings up the ones we tent to use the most? I know that is subjective, but some sort of order would be better than the seemingly random arrangement we get. I don't know if it is possible to get "smiley picture access" counts, but if it is, that could be used to rank them...

Again, not critical, but would improve "usability"...

Thanks to you and Mikorist for all your efforts here.

Scott

Hooo Noes, I say group them together (like icons) in 4 rows grids (or more, while 1 wide smiley can use 2 rows) with short length scroll bars. How come we still have horizontal page like smileys around? Are those user feedbacks worth nothing?

[sbaeder]

I say group them together (like icons) in 4 rows grids (or more, while 1 wide smiley can use 2 rows) with short length scroll bars. How come we still have horizontal page like smileys around? Are those user feedbacks worth nothing?

I don't mind the separate window view, and having the horizontal view at the bottom of the reply box is OK too...more choice! But don't like to have to scroll 3-4 times to get to the ones we all seem to use most often

[MedEvil]

Do it like i do and simply start remembering the codes for the smileys you mostly use and type them directly.
It's a lot fater than point and click, even without scrolling.