fxscrpt
i agree and disagree (maybe disagree is wrong word).
your "2." opinion written by psc at very early stage of this topic (and written in boot-land by psc many times):
..
The WinBuilder projects are not a BartPE which packs MANY THINGS into the core, including unnecessary registry entries, fonts etc.
The core of most WinBuilder projects is rather minimized.
And if an app needs a font, a DLL or whatelse, the app script has to take care that in the final PE there is everything the app needs.
i dont have a problem with that, or in other words i agree (and like) the idea and method of hojope-nativeex-livexp and it is obvious that script that includes pcsview.exe should have lines to provide c_932.nls and reg.
BUT
as medevil indicate, it is hard to find error reason is c_932.nls !
also psc/jaclazz messages remind me sth in mind with MedEvil post
- this problem does not exist in BartPE
problem is, whenever things happen, we check with bartpe, and sometimes with sherpya xpe. (this issue/problem have nothing to do with sherpya
![:cheers:](http://reboot.pro/public/style_emoticons/default/cheers.gif)
, only an example)
what i ask for is, why dont we have an option to make a build with pebuilder default core settings!?
i guess it will add another ~100mb to the build which we dont like
but with a benefit,
it will be very helpfull script writer to observe and make fast trials
maybe something
like![Posted Image](http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/5280/nls2ks2.png)
I like the idea for extra options but i dont like the method to use hojope. I believe hojope should be keep as it is.
Maybe with another script, or another hojope (like hojope2plus and maybe with some options on gui like in picture), so when all options selected, current hojope+hojope2plus will make what pebuilder.exe does as a core.....
I
hope i could describe the idea, if not sorry for my bad english, but honestly i tried.
For this particular rare case,
I believe it will be no harm to use local additions script for that reason as i wrote before
maybe optional with a pCheckBox , and giving a little information on History..= to show which application needs this.
i guess there is a misunderstanding, i mean history in script file, not on gui.
in fact local additions script was not created for such a fix, this issue effects all builds not only different language sources. But instead of writing a seperate scprit i dont see a problem using existent locale additions script for this rare case. As we know when similar case numbers increase we will either have options on hojope, or a seperate script, or....
and pcheckbox is for the ones who likes to have minimum build and the one who wants a minimum build may check history (or an explanation with // ) in script file.
in my point of view, with this adding everybody is happy,
others on world happy because they wont have such an issue/problem,
minimalists are happy because they have a pCheckBox to get rid of 159kb C_932.NLS
and new minimalists can easly read comment and reproduce the reason by reading history or // in script file.
And i am happy, because by luck i helped to kill a vodoo.
Why we have so much troubles to communicate?
i know the real reason(s) and tried to explain, but english is not enough to write with current comunication problem. And message stories we experienced clearly shows the reasons (maybe other have ideas). I should gather them for memo but it is hard to gather messages scatered around.
another funny theory from me:
maybe horoscope problem like Sagittarius dont have much friends from Aquarius
(BTW I like your ironic(?) way when you use 'issue' instead of 'problem'
)
I am optimistic, "issue" sounds to me more solveable than "problem".